A recently enacted TNI (Indonesian National Armed Forces) law has drawn sharp criticism from various quarters, with concerns mounting that it breaches democratic values and the military’s core mandate. Analysts, human rights advocates, and civil society organizations argue that the legislation represents a step backward for Indonesia’s democratic reforms and could lead to an overreach of military influence in civilian affairs.  

One of the primary points of contention is the expansion of the TNI’s authority beyond its traditional defense role. The new law includes provisions that [mention a key controversial point based on the search results, e.g., allow active military officers to hold more civilian government posts without resigning, or extend the retirement age of high-ranking officers]. Critics argue that such provisions blur the lines between the military and civilian spheres, potentially undermining civilian supremacy and accountability – a cornerstone of democratic governance. This is seen as a direct breach of the intended separation of powers.  

Furthermore, concerns have been raised about the legislative process itself. Many criticize the lack of transparency and meaningful public consultation during the drafting and passage of the law. This rushed process, conducted with limited public input, is seen as a violation of democratic principles that emphasize openness and participation in lawmaking. The absence of robust debate and consideration of dissenting voices further fuels the criticism that the law breaches fundamental democratic values.  

The potential consequences of the new TNI law are also a major worry. Critics fear a resurgence of the military’s “dual function” (dwifungsi), a doctrine from the authoritarian Suharto era where the military held significant influence in civilian governance. Allowing active military personnel to occupy more civilian posts could lead to conflicts of interest, undermine meritocracy in civilian institutions, and ultimately weaken democratic oversight. This expanded role is seen as a deviation from the TNI‘s primary mandate of national defense.  

In conclusion, the newly enacted TNI law faces significant opposition, with critics asserting that it breaches democratic values by blurring the lines between military and civilian authority, lacking transparency in its passage, and potentially exceeding the TNI‘s core mandate.